改进模糊TOPSIS群决策法在应急设施选址中的应用

张长泽; 裴骁

doi:10.13568/j.cnki.651094.651316.2019.05.22.0002

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

改进模糊TOPSIS群决策法在应急设施选址中的应用

工程技术 | 更新时间：2026-01-19

- 改进模糊TOPSIS群决策法在应急设施选址中的应用
- 改进模糊TOPSIS群决策法在应急设施选址中的应用
- 新疆大学学报（自然科学版中英文） 2020年37卷第1期页码：109-117
- 作者机构：
  
  兰州交通大学交通运输学院
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  甘肃省高等学校创新能力提升项目(2019B-050)
- DOI：10.13568/j.cnki.651094.651316.2019.05.22.0002
  中图分类号： X4;O159;O225
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
[1]张长泽,裴骁.改进模糊TOPSIS群决策法在应急设施选址中的应用[J].新疆大学学报(自然科学版)(中英文),2020,37(01):109-117.
[1]张长泽,裴骁.改进模糊TOPSIS群决策法在应急设施选址中的应用[J].新疆大学学报(自然科学版)(中英文),2020,37(01):109-117. DOI： 10.13568/j.cnki.651094.651316.2019.05.22.0002.

DOI：10.13568/j.cnki.651094.651316.2019.05.22.0002.

摘要

为确保在应急救援设施选址群决策问题中决策的合理性

充分考虑灾后不确定因素和环境的模糊性以及针对评价值为混合型的多属性群决策问题

引入模糊集理论

将改进的逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)扩展到模糊环境问题

提出一种基于模糊TOPSIS的应急救援设施选址群决策的方法.由于在应急多属性决策问题中

决策者的决策数据经常会出现不确定性

因此精确的数值不足以来模拟现实生活中的情况.在此情况下

该算法采用三角模糊数、语言变量等来进行评价决策

并运用组合赋权法来计算各评价指标和各决策者的综合权重.最后

通过具体的算例来验证该方法的可行性和有效性

并进行灵敏度分析.结果表明

所提出的方法符合实际决策机制.

Abstract

In order to ensure the rationality of decision in the decision-making problem of emergency rescue facilities

fully considered the uncertainty of the post-disaster uncertainties

the ambiguity of the environment and the multi-attribute group decision-making problem for the evaluation value

the fuzzy set theory is introduced.Improved TOPSIS extended to fuzzy environment

and proposed a method based on fuzzy TOPSIS for emergency rescue facility location group decision. Because in the emergency multi-attribute decision-making problem

the decision-making data of decision makers often appear fuzzy

so the accurate numerical value is insufficient to simulate the situation in real life.In this case

the algorithm uses triangular fuzzy numbers

linguistic variables to make evaluation decisions

and uses the general weights method to calculate the comprehensive weights of each evaluation attribute and each decision maker.Finally

the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method are veri?ed by a speci?c example

and the sensitivity analysis is carried out. The result shows that the proposed method conforms to actual decision-making mechanism.

关键词

Keywords

references

孙庆珍,李明,贾燕.基于多目标决策的城市应急设施选址问题研究[J].科技和产业, 2014, 14(6):5-8.SUN Q Z, LI M, JIA Y. The research on the location problem of city disaster emergency rescue facilities based on the multiobjective decision[J].Science Technology and Industry, 2014, 14(6):5-8.(in Chinese)

丁雪枫,尤建新,王洪丰.突发事件应急设施选址问题的模型及优化算法[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 40(9):1428-1433.DING X F, YOU J X, WANG H F. A model of emergency rescue facility location problem for emergency incidents and its optimal solution algorithm[J].Journal of TONJI University(Nature Science), 2012, 40(9):1428-1433.(in Chinese)

高雷阜,于冬梅,赵世杰.不确定需求下应急物资储备库选址鲁棒优化模型[J].中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(12):170-176.GAO L F, YU D M, ZHAO S J. Robust optimization model for emergency supplies repository location problem under demand uncertainty[J].China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(12):170-176.(in Chinese)

孙毅,孙慧,许鹏.基于TOPSIS的新疆15个地州市碳排放经济效率评价研究[J].新疆大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 31(2):227-232+237.SUN Y, SUN H, XU P.A Rsearch on Economic Efficiency of Carbon Emissions in Xinjiang 15 Prefectures Based on the TOPSIS Evaluation[J].Journal of Xinjiang University(Natural Science Edition), 2014, 31(2):227-232+237.(in Chinese)

丁传明,黎放,齐欢.一种基于相似度的混合型多属性决策方法[J].系统工程与电子技术, 2007(5):737-740.DING C M, LI F, QI H. Technique of hybrid multiple attribute decision making based on similarity degree to ideal solution[J].Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2007(5):737-740.(in Chinese)

刘培德,关忠良.一种基于二元语义的混合型多属性决策方法[J].控制与决策, 2009, 24(7):1074-1077+1082.LIU P D, GUANG Z L. Hybrid multiple attribute decision making method based on 2-tuple[J].Control and Decision, 2009, 24(7):1074-1077+1082.(in Chinese)

赵树平,梁昌勇,戚筱雯,等.城市突发事件的应急设施选址群决策方法[J]系统管理学报, 2014, 23(6):810-818.ZHAO S P, LIANG C Y, QI X W, et al. A group decision making method for emergency facility location for disruptions in urban areas.[J]Journal of Systems&Management, 2014, 23(6):810-818.(in Chinese)

梁昌勇,戚筱雯,丁勇,等.一种基于TOPSIS的混合型多属性群决策方法[J].中国管理科学, 2012, 20(4):109-117.LIANG C Y, QI X W, DING Y, et al. A hybrid multi-criteria group decision making with TOPSIS method[J].Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2012, 20(4):109-117.(in Chinese)

杨萌,袁逸萍,李明,等.基于熵权模糊法的新疆区域两化融合发展水平评价研究[J].新疆大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 34(4):488-492.YANG M, YUAN Y P, LI M, et al. Evaluation on “Integration of Informatization and Industrialization”Development Level of Xinjiang Region Based on Entropy Weight-Fuzzy Multifactorial Method[J].Journal of Xinjiang University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 34(4):488-492.(in Chinese)

谢以恒,沈菊琴,吴征,等.基于TOPSIS法的城市内涝事件应急群决策研究[J].水资源与水工程学报, 2017, 28(1):104-108.XIE Y H, SHEN J Q, WU Z, et al.Study of urban waterlogging events emergency group decision based on the TOPSIS method[J].Journal of Water Resources&Water Engineering, 2017, 28(1):104-108.(in Chinese)

ZADEH L A. Fuzzy sets[J].Information and Control, 1965, 8(3):338-353.

VAN LAARHOVEN P J M, PEDRYCZ W. A fuzzy extension of saaty’s priority theory[J].Fuzzy sets and Systems, 1983, 11(2):199-227.

BORDOGNA G, FEDRIZZI M, PASI G.A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1997, 27:126-133.

戴跃强,徐泽水,李琰,等.语言信息评估新标度及其应用[J].中国管理科学, 2008, 16(2):145-149.DAI Y Q, XU Z S, LI Y, et al. New evaluation scale of linguistic information and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2008, 16(2):145-149.(in Chinese)

CHEN C T. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment[J]. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 2000,111(4):1-9.

XU Z S. An interactive approach to multiple attribute group decision making with multi-granular uncertain linguistic information[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2009, 18:119-145.

浏览量

347

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于单电流传输器双二阶滤波器的研究