

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 新疆大学资源与环境科学学院绿洲生态教育部重点实验室
2. 德国艾希施泰特—英格尔斯塔特大学数学与地理学院
3. 德国埃伯斯瓦尔德应用技术大学森林与环境学院
Published:2015
移动端阅览
[1]玉米提·哈力克,塔依尔江·艾山,张利霞,等.柯柯牙城郊防护林主要造林类型土壤改良效应研究[J].新疆大学学报(自然科学版),2015,32(03):258-264+250.
[1]玉米提·哈力克,塔依尔江·艾山,张利霞,等.柯柯牙城郊防护林主要造林类型土壤改良效应研究[J].新疆大学学报(自然科学版),2015,32(03):258-264+250. DOI: 10.13568/j.cnki.651094.2015.03.002.
DOI:10.13568/j.cnki.651094.2015.03.002.
城郊防护林作为城市的生态基础设施为城市及其居民持续获得自然生态服务提供保障.本文对新疆南部典型绿洲城市——阿克苏市郊柯柯牙人工防护林工程的土壤修复与改良效应进行定量研究
以该地区4种不同造林类型(红枣林、香梨林、苹果林和杨树林)土壤为研究对象
实测观察其土壤理化性质及其垂直分布变化
对比分析4种林型下土壤不同因子的差异及各因子间的相关性
揭示了人工防护林建设对裸露沙地土壤的综合改良效应.结果表明:(1)人工造林使原沙地土壤物理结构得以改善、土壤水分大幅提升、p H值和可溶性盐含量有效降低、土壤有机质和养分含量显著提高;(2)红枣林地土壤物理改良效果最为明显
对于可溶性盐而言
杨树林地土壤含盐量最低
经济(果园)林地呈现中层土壤(10~30 cm)高于表层和底层土壤的规律
体现了人工漫灌的"压盐"作用;(3)各林型对土壤化学因子改良效果存在差异
土壤各因子之间存在着较为显著的相关性;改良后的土壤质量优劣程度排序为:苹果林地>红枣林地>香梨林地>杨树林地.
Peri-urban shelterbelt as an ecological infrastructure of the city that supplies safeguard for urban and its residents to obtain sustainable services provided by natural ecosystem. In this paper
we did quantitative analysis of the effects of Kokyar artificial afforestation project in peri-urban area of Aksu
a typical oases city in Sothern Xinjiang- on soil remediation and improvement. Soil samples of four main forest types(Apple
Jujube
Pear
Poplar forest) were selected as the research object
based on observation of the physical and chemical properties of the soil and its vertical distribution change
we made comparative study on the differences of soil physicochemical factors and their relationship under different forest types
in order to assess the improvement effect of shelterbelt forest construction on bare sandy soil. The results showed that:(1) Artificial afforestation project had a significant effect on improvement of physical structure of sandy soil by raising its soil moisture
reducing p H and soluble salt content and increasing soil organic matter and nutrient content;(2) The soil improvement effect of Jujube orchard forest was obvious. For soluble salt
lowest soil salinity were observed in Poplar forest stand while soil salinity of middle soil layer(10-30cm) within economic orchard forest was higher than the soil salinity top and bottom soil layers. It reflected that the "press salts" role of artificial irrigation;(3) Various forest types had different improvement effects on soil physical chemical properties. There was significant correlation between each soil factors. Soil quality after improvement was listed as: Apple > Jujube > Pear > Poplar Forest.
孙龙,李俊涛,刘强.中国城郊防护林研究进展[J].防护林科技,2008,26(6):27-30
朱积余,蒋燚,梁杰森,等.苍梧珠江生态经济型防护林体系布局与结构配置研究[J].广西林业科学,2010,39(4):173-178
王昭艳,左长清,曹文洪,等.红壤丘陵区不同植被恢复模式土壤理化性质相关分析[J].土壤学报,2011,48(4):715-724
李文忠,贺永元,张伟华,等.北川河流域退耕还林(草)对土壤质量影响的评价[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(6):1-6
龙健,李娟,邓启琼,等.贵州喀斯特山区石漠化土壤理化性质及分型特征研究[J].土壤通报,2006,37(4):635-539
Stogsdill WR,Wittwer RF,Hennessey TC.Relationship between through fall and stand density in a Pinus taeda plantation[J].Forest Ecology and Management,1989,29:105-113.
王勤,张宗应,徐小牛.安徽大别山库区不同林分类型的土壤特性及其水涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(3):59-62
胡亚林,曹德慧,范志平,等.半干旱区沙质退化草地造林对土壤质量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(11):2391-2397
刘占锋,傅伯杰,刘国华,等.土壤质量与土壤质量指标及其评价[J].生态学报,2006,26(3):901-913
屈晓婉,高照良,李永红,等.不同治理措施对秦巴山区渣场土壤养分与植被恢复的影响[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(3):87-91
孙博,解建仓,汪妮,等.秸秆覆盖对盐渍化土壤水盐影响的试验研究[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(3):48-51.
林德喜,樊后保,苏兵强,等.马尾松林下套种阔叶树土壤理化性质的研究[J].土壤学报,2004,41(4):655-659
王贤,张洪江,程金花,等.重庆四面山几种林地土壤颗粒分形特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(3):154-159
阿克苏柯柯牙绿化工程志编委会.柯柯牙绿化工程志[M].乌鲁木齐:新疆人民出版社,2006
张利霞,玉米提·哈力克,阿丽亚·拜都热拉,等.阿克苏市郊柯柯牙防护林不同林龄新疆杨防风及土壤改良效应[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(5):73-77
薛慧勒,孙兰珍,甘信民.花生品种抗旱性综合评价及其抗旱机理的数量分析[J].干旱地区农业研究,1999(1):83-87
王彩华,黄永苍,张汝清.锥孔螺纹压套的模糊优化设计[J].重庆大学学报,1987(5):129-140
林大仪.土壤学实验指导[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2004
马利强,郝玉光,张秋良,等.不同配置农田防护林对土壤肥力的影响[J].林业资源管理,2009,(6):91-95
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析(3版)[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2008,178-179
朱志梅,杨持,曹明明,等.多伦草原土壤理化性质在沙漠化过程中的变化[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(1):1-5
0
Views
275
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621